Subject: RE: [linux-audio-user] The trouble with disks
From: John Anderson (ardour_AT_semiosix.com)
Date: Fri Dec 19 2003 - 18:45:02 EET
On Fri, 2003-12-19 at 15:34, Mark Knecht wrote:
> > What are the other options? I've looked at PCI latencies for card and
> > drive controller, IRQ ordering (although APIC seems to make this
> > irrelevant, or at least uncontrollable), OS disk scheduler
> > (anticipatory, deadline and cfq), tagged queueing (high values almost
> > guarantee xruns on recording but don't seem to improve playback).
> >
> > Sheesh, at this rate if I get another dual-processor machine, I'll be
> > able to run jackd at -p 16 -n 2 :-|
>
> A dual-processor system won't necessarily change a disk latency problem.
I had a dual-processor system until it died about 3 weeks ago. It
definitely didn't have this problem, even though it's using physically
the same SCSI controller and disk. Well, it had a 64bit PCI slot for the
controller. OK, I've upgraded to 2.6 since then, in a partially
successful attempt to reduce the extent of the dropouts.
> Have you tried running with larger buffers? Sorry but I don't have the
> original post. Try -p 2048 -n 2 or -p 1024 -n 2 or -p 512 -n 4/8/16 if
> your card accepts it and see what happens. Possibly there is just a
> better setting to be using.
Still happens, but less, at -p 2048 -n 2 which is the largest the card
will accept.
> Also, have you run Benno's latency test app? It's good at showing
> problems like other apps stepping in and causing problems somewhere, and
> it can guide you towards the best -p/-n settings.
Yip, 0 overruns on all tests at 2x128.
Real headscratcher, innit?
bye
John
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Fri Dec 19 2003 - 18:38:26 EET