Re: [linux-audio-user] Advice needed re: latency tuning/optimization, esp. video

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] Advice needed re: latency tuning/optimization, esp. video
From: Jan Depner (eviltwin69_AT_cableone.net)
Date: Wed Feb 18 2004 - 00:41:29 EET


Chris,

        I was just looking at one of the other posts. If your problem is the
video card you might try tuning the PCI latency. Check out my page -
http://myweb.cableone.net/eviltwin69/Arcana.html. There are a couple of
links that cover latency really well.

Jan

On Tue, 2004-02-17 at 15:51, Chris Metzler wrote:
>
> On 16 Feb 2004 14:54:13 -0600
> Jan Depner <eviltwin69_AT_cableone.net> wrote:
> >
> > Agreed. Your system should rock like crazy except for one leetle
> > problem. IRQ 9 is higher priority than IRQ 10 so every time you get
> > disk activity you're probably dropping audio.
>
> Yeah, that's what I would have *expected* -- so I was really surprised
> when the latency tests didn't work out that way. Playing PCM audio
> while writing, then copying, a 1.5 GB file (half again as large as my
> RAM, so can't RAM-cache it), with my disk over 90% full, still produced
> what I *think* (if I'm understanding all this correctly) are pretty
> good numbers (100% within 1ms of the fragment latency). But I do plan
> on tinkering with this, especially if the performance is troublesome
> when I start doing real stuff.
>
> But while the disk results looked good, the graphics results weren't
> very . . .
>
> -c
>
> --
> Chris Metzler cmetzler_AT_speakeasy.snip-me.net
> (remove "snip-me." to email)
>
> "As a child I understood how to give; I have forgotten this grace since I
> have become civilized." - Chief Luther Standing Bear


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Wed Feb 18 2004 - 00:40:07 EET