Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] running jack as non-root?
From: Jack O'Quin (joq_AT_io.com)
Date: Sat Feb 28 2004 - 19:54:15 EET
> >>>>> "Jack" == Jack O'Quin <joq_AT_io.com> writes:
> Jack> All the complaints I've seen about LSM were rather vague,
> Jack> and mostly seem motivated by discontent that someone else's
> Jack> security hooks got introduced into the mainline kernel. The
> Jack> current hooks are quite adequate for my simple needs.
Hasse Hagen Johansen <hhj_AT_musikcheck.dk> writes:
> But I don't think the arguments a vague...http://rsbac.org/lsm.htm
That's the complaint I was talking about. Those nine "issues" are
more matters of style than substance.
To my ears it comes across as a rant about the fact that Linus
accepted NSA's framework into the base kernel and not his. But, I
don't know all the history behind it. Maybe he had a valid beef.
To me, that is all moot. I need to work with what's available, which
is the SELinux framework. Actually, it's a lot better than I had
feared when first looking into the matter.
-- joq
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sat Feb 28 2004 - 19:52:47 EET