Re: [linux-audio-user] Fwd: [Jamin] Re: soft clip: Achieving Gain, inconsequential overloads

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] Fwd: [Jamin] Re: soft clip: Achieving Gain, inconsequential overloads
From: Jan Depner (eviltwin69_AT_cableone.net)
Date: Mon Apr 12 2004 - 23:50:57 EEST


On Sun, 2004-04-11 at 22:43, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-04-11 at 19:03, R Parker wrote:
> >
> > > My first step, which doesn't effect sound if it's
> > > done right, was to
> > > simply normalize the tracks up a bit. (I told the
> > > normalizer to make the
> > > highest peak -1db)
> >
> > I've never normalized a track. Can normalization hold
> > a -0.5db peak to -0.5 while it pushes a -12db valley
> > up to -6db?
>
> No, normalization only scales the data points so that relative amplitude
> is maintained. The WHOLE file is scaled so that -3db becomes -1db, -6db
> becomes -5db, -9db becomes -7db, etc. This does raise the overall volume
> by 2db, but it won't normally get you all that much volume if there are
> a lot of dynamics in the file or else you'll clip those peaks.

That's "peak" normalization. There is also "RMS" normalization which
doesn't scale everything equally.

Jan


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Mon Apr 12 2004 - 23:47:07 EEST