Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] jamin: lookahead_limiter_const_1906.so ?
From: Jan Depner (eviltwin69_AT_cableone.net)
Date: Fri Apr 30 2004 - 22:39:00 EEST
The only difference between the one you're using now and the one it
can't find is latency. They're both brick-wall limiters. You don't
want anything over 0dB passing through.
Jan
On Fri, 2004-04-30 at 15:02, derek holzer wrote:
> Ron,
>
> R Parker wrote:
> > Derek, I think you can ignore that error. Does JAMin
> > start and do you have a working limiter?
>
> Of course, yes it starts, but I wondered what limiter it chooses then? A
> hard limiter, or the other lookahead limiter? Checking the flattened
> peaks of some of my Jamin-processed files, I might almost think it is a
> hard, brickwall limiter.
>
> d.
>
>
> --
> derek holzer ::: http://www.umatic.nl
> ---Oblique Strategy # 115:
> "Make a sudden, destructive unpredictable action; incorporate"
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Fri Apr 30 2004 - 22:35:09 EEST