Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] jamin: lookahead_limiter_const_1906.so ?
From: R Parker (rtp405_AT_yahoo.com)
Date: Fri Apr 30 2004 - 23:14:37 EEST
Jan, you could have replied 30 seconds sooner and I
wouldn't look so ignorant. :)
ron
--- Jan Depner <eviltwin69_AT_cableone.net> wrote:
> The only difference between the one you're using now
> and the one it
> can't find is latency. They're both brick-wall
> limiters. You don't
> want anything over 0dB passing through.
>
> Jan
>
> On Fri, 2004-04-30 at 15:02, derek holzer wrote:
> > Ron,
> >
> > R Parker wrote:
> > > Derek, I think you can ignore that error. Does
> JAMin
> > > start and do you have a working limiter?
> >
> > Of course, yes it starts, but I wondered what
> limiter it chooses then? A
> > hard limiter, or the other lookahead limiter?
> Checking the flattened
> > peaks of some of my Jamin-processed files, I might
> almost think it is a
> > hard, brickwall limiter.
> >
> > d.
> >
> >
> > --
> > derek holzer ::: http://www.umatic.nl
> > ---Oblique Strategy # 115:
> > "Make a sudden, destructive unpredictable action;
> incorporate"
>
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs
http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/careermakeover
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Fri Apr 30 2004 - 23:09:26 EEST