Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] wav editor that does not require alsa
From: Mikhail Ramendik (mr_AT_ramendik.ru)
Date: Tue May 04 2004 - 00:38:21 EEST
Hello,
miriam clinton (iriXx) wrote:
> Audacity.
>
> without a doubt its the best, and strongest application for wave
> editing,
I've downloaded and compiled it. And yes, it is what I need.
Good wave functionality; even recording; all of that via OSS.
I don't know if Ardour is cooler for the pro stuff; for what I do,
Audacity is exactly the match.
Thanks to all who pointed me to it!
Yours, Mikhail Ramendik
> with support for VST plugins via the vst import device (sorry
> guys, forgotten what it's called, hmm it might be Alsa only but there
> are plenty of good OSS-based effects too). i still use Audacity despite
> having the option of using Alsa - its also lightweight, and does a nice
> job of mixing, recording and editing. can't reccomend it highly enough.
>
> hth,
>
> m~
>
> Mikhail Ramendik wrote:
>
> >Hello,
> >
> >I would like to do some simple WAV editing. Actually, minimum
> >pre-mastering of an audio CD: normalizing, cutting out pieces, dividing
> >into tracks, altering volume in some places.
> >
> >My problem is, at this point alsa drivers are not working for me. And in
> >itself this is not a problem. The audio source is not the sound card, so
> >I don't do realtime audio capture. And as I only want simple editing, I
> >don't care about playback latency.
> >
> >Which WAV editor should I use? I'd like it to be able to work with OSS
> >(perhaps via jack-oss?).
> >
> >Yours, Mikhail Ramendik
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Tue May 04 2004 - 00:39:48 EEST