Subject: RE: [linux-audio-user] A bit of good news -- paper now availablefor your viewing pleasure and/or comments
From: Ivica Ico Bukvic (ico_AT_fuse.net)
Date: Sat May 29 2004 - 06:40:49 EEST
Fixed! Thanks for your input!
Ivica Ico Bukvic, composer & multimedia sculptor
http://meowing.ccm.uc.edu/~ico/
> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-audio-user-bounces_AT_music.columbia.edu [mailto:linux-audio-
> user-bounces_AT_music.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of luis jure
> Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 6:45 PM
> To: A list for linux audio users
> Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] A bit of good news -- paper now
> availablefor your viewing pleasure and/or comments
>
> el Fri, 28 May 2004 00:05:20 -0400
> "Ivica Ico Bukvic" <ico_AT_fuse.net> escribió:
>
>
> > Any comments and/or suggestions are welcome and appreciated (although I
> > honestly cannot guarantee that all of them will make it into final
> > revision due to aforementioned deadline).
>
> hello,
>
> i think it's a very well balanced and realistic survey, highlighting the
> advantages but not hiding the difficulties and shortcomings of linux as an
> audio workstation.
>
> here are two minor suggestions:
>
> 1) 7.2, picking the right distribution
>
> i know that there are literally hundreds of distributions out there, and
> that it's impossible to mention them all, but i really think that, since
> you're mentioning different approaches (using pre-compiled binaries, rpms,
> debs, compiling from sources, ebuilds, live cds, etc), a line dedicated to
> Linux from Scratch would be pertinent, since it means a completely
> different
> approach, building the whole linux system from sources
> (http://www.linuxfromscratch.org)
>
>
> 2) 7.3, obtaining audio software
>
> where you mention Thac's rpm and turnkey, i'd add audioslack for the
> slackware distribution (http://www.audioslack.com/)
>
> best,
>
> lj
>
>
>
>
> --
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sat May 29 2004 - 07:29:08 EEST