[linux-audio-user] Planet CCRMA and apt-get

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: [linux-audio-user] Planet CCRMA and apt-get
From: toby_AT_tobiah.org
Date: Fri Jun 18 2004 - 20:29:45 EEST

Hello,

I have just intalled Fedora Core II,
and was trying to use apt-get to install
ardour from Planet CCRMA. Some of the
packages will not insall, complaining about
missing keys. Anybody know what is happening
here?

Thanks,

Tobiah

Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
    liblrdf (0.3.7-1.rhfc1.ccrma)
    libsamplerate (0.1.0-2.rhfc1.ccrma)
    libsndfile (1.0.9-1.rhfc1.ccrma)
    raptor (1.0.0-1.rhfc1.ccrma)
The following NEW packages will be installed:
    ardour (0.9beta11.2-1.rhfc1.ccrma)
    liblrdf (0.3.7-1.rhfc1.ccrma)
    libsamplerate (0.1.0-2.rhfc1.ccrma)
    libsndfile (1.0.9-1.rhfc1.ccrma)
    raptor (1.0.0-1.rhfc1.ccrma)
0 upgraded, 5 newly installed, 0 removed and 12 not upgraded.
Need to get 0B/4687kB of archives.
After unpacking 13.2MB of additional disk space will be used.
Checking GPG signatures...Y/n]
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/raptor_1.0.0-1.rhfc1.ccrma_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unknown signature /var/cache/apt/archives/liblrdf_0.3.7-1.rhfc1.ccrma_i386.rpm: (SHA1) DSA sha1 md5
(GPG) NOT OK (MISSING KEYS: GPG#68d9802a)
Unknown signature /var/cache/apt/archives/libsndfile_1.0.9-1.rhfc1.ccrma_i386.rpm: (SHA1) DSA sha1
md5 (GPG) NOT OK (MISSING KEYS: GPG#68d9802a)
Unknown signature /var/cache/apt/archives/libsamplerate_0.1.0-2.rhfc1.ccrma_i386.rpm: (SHA1) DSA
sha1 md5 (GPG) NOT OK (MISSING KEYS: GPG#68d9802a)
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/ardour_0.9beta11.2-1.rhfc1.ccrma_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
E: Error(s) while checking package signatures:
2 unsigned package(s)
3 package(s) with unknown signatures
0 package(s) with illegal/corrupted signatures

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Fri Jun 18 2004 - 20:29:41 EEST