[linux-audio-user] Re: Sample Rates/Sample Sizes

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: [linux-audio-user] Re: Sample Rates/Sample Sizes
From: Greg Murphy (public_gmm_AT_yahoo.co.uk)
Date: Tue Jun 22 2004 - 14:13:46 EEST


> Anahata wrote:
> But what about effects such as stochastic resonance?
> Add a (miniscule) amount of distortion and we hear
> more of the music.

> This seems to suggest the possibility of the
recording of
> an acoustic
> performance of music sounding "better" than being
present at the performance itself.

> I see thin ice here!

Not what I'm saying really. "Better" would imply a
euphonic aspect and I'm just talking about the
information content. There's also no reason why the
low-level noise could not be added to a performance
e.g. by the rustling of clothing ;-)

I'm not an expert on this stuff but it's been proven
that stochastic resonance does increase the
information content of non-linear systems (Google for
it, there's lots of material). One question that does
arise, however, is if this added information falls
below the noise floor of the reproduction system in
use.

Greg

        
        
                
___________________________________________________________ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - sooooo many all-new ways to express yourself http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Tue Jun 22 2004 - 14:09:27 EEST