Re: [linux-audio-user] Finale for Linux

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] Finale for Linux
From: ricktaylor_AT_speakeasy.net
Date: Tue Jul 13 2004 - 23:03:57 EEST


> From: Eric Dantan Rzewnicki [mailto:rzewnickie_AT_rfa.org]

> My understanding is that apps need to follow a certain model (call-back
> base processing vs. block processing, iiuc) in order to function
> properly within the jack graph to meet it's low-latency and synchornous
> execution requirements. There were some pre-existing apps that fit this
> model and some that didn't. The authors of some of those that didn't fit
> rewrote their apps or wrote new ones. Some other authors either didn't
> care about jack's goals or disagreed with them and so their apps aren't
> jackable. I don't think there are any behind the scenes political
> maneuvers going on to keep certain apps out of the jack family.

 Again... I'm not suggesting that.


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Tue Jul 13 2004 - 23:13:04 EEST