[linux-audio-user] CPU clock - beware

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: [linux-audio-user] CPU clock - beware
From: Matthew Barber (brbrofsvl_AT_aol.com)
Date: Tue Jan 01 2002 - 09:56:33 EET

This might not be an appropriate place to ask this question, but I've
gotten help here before on a number of things...

So I have an Athlon XP 2500+ and a DFI motherboard with the nvidia
nforce2 chipset. I have run it for almost a year, and it has been rock
solid under linux (not as much under Windows), red hat 9 and planet
ccrma kernel/drivers/software -- 2.4.26-1.ll.rh90.ccrma. RME hdsp
multiface, and um... 2x512MB Crucial unbuffered DDR400. Great, except -
I have never been able to set the appropriate bus clock in the BIOS
without linux becoming COMPLETELY unstable. If I set it to the
published specs (166Mhz bus, x11 multiplier == 1.83Ghz), I usually can't
even get through the linux boot process; if it makes it through the boot
process, it will usually hang at the NVIDIA screen, or at the signin...
if it makes it past that, I can sign in, do a few things in a shell, but
then after about 2 minutes at most, the system freezes. And we're
talking about a hard freeze - no ctl-alt-del, no ctl-alt-backspace, no
response at all. Windows runs as fine as it ever has. The only way I
can get linux to run stably is to underclock the system at 100Mhz, which
puts my CPU clock at a wimpy 1.1Ghz. Setting the multiplier higher than
11 but maintaining the 100Mhz bus clock results in the same problem. I
thought for a moment that the memory clock and the bus clock weren't
syncing, so I set them in 1:1 ratio - linux still hates it at any
frequency. You can lock AGP at 66Mhz, still nothing doing. This is a
board and proc combo that has been renowned for mega overclocking - I
shouldn't have to underclock it to have things run right. Windows runs
fine so I'm wondering if it's not a problem in my kernel or distro
rather than the bios or hardware. I have not as yet tried to boot
another kernel, but I will tomorrow when my mind is clear (I just
started trying to fix it today, and I'm weary). Any ideas about it, or
about where I could read to fix it?

Thanks, Matt

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Wed Jul 21 2004 - 09:11:47 EEST