Re: [linux-audio-user] Hydrogen compile problem

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] Hydrogen compile problem
From: Jos Laake (jos_AT_radiks.net)
Date: Wed Aug 25 2004 - 10:45:04 EEST


Austin Acton wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-08-24 at 10:22 +0200, Comix wrote:
>
>>Il mar, 2004-08-24 alle 07:47, Jos Laake ha scritto:
>>
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>I'm trying to compile hydrogen on my CCRMA/RedHat PC (Pentium 4)
>>>And I get this error:
>>
>>Hi Jos, is a QT related problem, but you can try with the 0.9.0beta2
>>that I have uploaded yesterday.
>>The hydrogen site is still not updated...here's the direct link
>>
>>http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/hydrogen/hydrogen-0.9.0beta2.tar.gz?download
>
>
> With beta2, I am having this error:
> g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../lib -I/usr/lib/qt3//include -
> I/usr/X11R6/include -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT -D_REENTRANT -O3 -c -o
> LadspaFXSelector.o `test -f 'LadspaFXSelector.cpp' || echo
> './'`LadspaFXSelector.cpp
> InstrumentPropertiesDialog.cpp: In member function `virtual void
> InstrumentPropertiesDialog::layerSelected()':
> InstrumentPropertiesDialog.cpp:208: error: `round' undeclared (first use
> this function)
> InstrumentPropertiesDialog.cpp:208: error: (Each undeclared identifier
> is reported only once for each function it appears in.)
> make[3]: *** [InstrumentPropertiesDialog.o] Error 1

Hi, it's me, Jos, the one who started this thread.
I downloaded the hydrogen-0.9.0beta2.tar.gz and tried
installing it. The ./configure script showed me that
I didn't have the LRDF package. So I downloaded that.
( http://plugin.org.uk/lrdf/liblrdf-0.3.7.tar.gz )
In compiling that, it told me I didn't have 'raptor'.
So I downloaded that.
( http://www.redland.opensource.ac.uk/dist/source/raptor-1.3.2.tar.gz )
Then I compiled raptor. No problem.
Then I compiled LRDF. No problem.
And *then* I configured hydrogen-0.9.0beta2.
This time it went all the way through and enabled everything.
Then when I did the 'make', it worked!
So I fired it up and...got my older version. Hmmmm... oops.
Went back and did 'make install'. (Fan my sheepish mug.)
Okay, now I have the 0.9.2 version.

Whoa... looks different. Guess I'll have to play around a bit...

Anyway, thanks for the help!

Peace,
~Jos~


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Wed Aug 25 2004 - 10:48:41 EEST