Re: Behringer [was Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: [linux-audio-dev] RME is no more]

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: Re: Behringer [was Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: [linux-audio-dev] RME is no more]
From: Marek Peteraj (marpet_AT_naex.sk)
Date: Mon Nov 29 2004 - 00:02:12 EET


On Sun, 2004-11-28 at 20:36, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 21:58:57 +0100, Marek Peteraj <marpet_AT_naex.sk> wrote:
> > On Sun, 2004-11-28 at 19:28, Chris Metzler wrote:
> > > On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 16:48:05 +0100
> > > Marek Peteraj <marpet_AT_naex.sk> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > If MacOSX can have them, so can we, we have a greater marketshare.
> > >
> > > Among pro-audio users? Can you show me the source for this claim?
> > > Thanks in advance.
> >
> > I meant overall marketshare.
> <SNIP>
> >I believe that the number of
> > pro audio hw customers that are also linux user lies somewhere between
> > 500-1000. It's a rough guess and it would be interesting to know more
> > precisely...
> <SNIP>
>
> Not fine grained enough...
>
> 1) # of Pro Audio users depending on Ardour for day to day recording.
> 0 or 1? (Ron - speak up!) ;-)

No not really. At least 6-7 people showed up on ardour mailinglists.
It's possible to look it up but would eat a lot of time.

>
> 2) # of Pro Audio users using Linux soft synths?
>
> 3) # of Pro Audio users using Linux as a command line tool for
> pre/post-processing of wave files?

Not really relevant. The only thing that relevant here is how many linux
audio users are customers of pro audio vendors no matter what usage.

Marek


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sun Nov 28 2004 - 22:10:23 EET