Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] [OT] Copyrights [was: Re: Behringer [was: Re: RME is no more]]
From: Tim Orford (tim_AT_orford.org)
Date: Mon Nov 29 2004 - 20:09:10 EET
On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 10:19:19PM -0500, Ruth A. Kramer wrote:
> IANAL, and this represents my best understanding.
yes i completely agree.
but i'm thinking that actually the distinction may not
be that esoteric after all, and is maybe why Frank originally
mentioned this issue in passing. The distinction emphasises:
a) that certain copyright holders dont have as much as they
claim (they own nothing but some rights), and
b) the genius of the GPL, in that it revolutionises production
and distribution while still staying true to the intent of
the law.
regards
-- Tim Orford
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Mon Nov 29 2004 - 20:28:58 EET