Re: [linux-audio-user] RME is no more

New Message	Reply	About this list	Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view	Other groups

Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] RME is no more
From: Hans Fugal (fugalh_AT_gmail.com)
Date: Tue Nov 30 2004 - 01:14:05 EET

Next message: Marek Peteraj: "Re: [linux-audio-user] Preach it! [was: Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: Behringer etc.]"
Previous message: Lee Revell: "Re: Behringer [was Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: [linux-audio-dev] RME isno more]"
In reply to: Marek Peteraj: "[linux-audio-user] RME is no more"
Next in thread: Jan Depner: "Re: [linux-audio-user] RME is no more"
Reply: Hans Fugal: "Re: [linux-audio-user] RME is no more"

We've seen some arguments for and against opening drivers. I'd like to
point out that ESR has written about this as an afterword to his essay
"The Magic Cauldron", which you can read here:

Afterword: Why Closing a Driver Loses Its Vendor Money
http://www.catb.org/~esr/writings/cathedral-bazaar/magic-cauldron/ar01s18.html

FWIW.

-- 
De gustibus non disputandum est.

Next message: Marek Peteraj: "Re: [linux-audio-user] Preach it! [was: Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: Behringer etc.]"
Previous message: Lee Revell: "Re: Behringer [was Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: [linux-audio-dev] RME isno more]"
In reply to: Marek Peteraj: "[linux-audio-user] RME is no more"
Next in thread: Jan Depner: "Re: [linux-audio-user] RME is no more"
Reply: Hans Fugal: "Re: [linux-audio-user] RME is no more"

New Message	Reply	About this list	Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view	Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Tue Nov 30 2004 - 01:21:16 EET