Re: [linux-audio-user] (OSS vs. RME) vs. (OSS + RME) [slightly OT]

New Message	Reply	About this list	Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view	Other groups

Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] (OSS vs. RME) vs. (OSS + RME) [slightly OT]
From: Rick Taylor (RickTaylor_AT_speakeasy.net)
Date: Sun Dec 19 2004 - 14:48:21 EET

Next message: Rick Taylor: "Re: [linux-audio-user] (OSS vs. RME) vs. (OSS + RME) [slightly OT]"
Previous message: Marek Peteraj: "Re: [linux-audio-user] (OSS vs. RME) vs. (OSS + RME) [slightly OT]"
Next in thread: Shayne O'Connor: "Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: [linux-audio-dev] RME is no more"
Maybe reply: Rick Taylor: "Re: [linux-audio-user] (OSS vs. RME) vs. (OSS + RME) [slightly OT]"

On Thursday 16 December 2004 08:45 pm, vord wrote:

> It is difficult to say which of the above issues is the biggest
> hindrance to Open Source domination.

Ummm...

-- 
www.RTaylor-Design.Com

Next message: Rick Taylor: "Re: [linux-audio-user] (OSS vs. RME) vs. (OSS + RME) [slightly OT]"
Previous message: Marek Peteraj: "Re: [linux-audio-user] (OSS vs. RME) vs. (OSS + RME) [slightly OT]"
Next in thread: Shayne O'Connor: "Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: [linux-audio-dev] RME is no more"
Maybe reply: Rick Taylor: "Re: [linux-audio-user] (OSS vs. RME) vs. (OSS + RME) [slightly OT]"

New Message	Reply	About this list	Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view	Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Mon Dec 20 2004 - 03:02:47 EET