Subject: Re: [Jackit-devel] Re: [linux-audio-user] 2.6.10
From: Fernando Lopez-Lezcano (nando_AT_ccrma.stanford.edu)
Date: Thu Dec 30 2004 - 03:30:12 EET
On Wed, 2004-12-29 at 16:52, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-12-29 at 16:21 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> > On Wed, 2004-12-29 at 15:10, Lee Revell wrote:
> > > I tried JACK today with vanilla 2.6.10 and had excellent reaults - it
> > > works with 32 and 64 frames, which previously required Ingo's patches.
> > > Many of the latency fixes have been going upstream, and it looks like we
> > > are finally showing some results. I think we may finally have a kernel
> > > that's usable out of the box for low latency audio.
> > >
> > > Can someone else try to verify these results?
> >
> > I'll try to asap. A Planet CCRMA fellow dweller just posted some very
> > rough comparison tests between several kernels and 2.6.10 was doing
> > quite well. The 0.7.33-04 DESKTOP_PREEMPT was doing much better but was
> > also less stable (but he was testing it with extremely low buffer
> > sizes).
>
> This was on the CCRMA list? Got a URL?
http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/pipermail/planetccrma/2004-December/007341.html
http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/pipermail/planetccrma/2004-December/007343.html
-- Fernando
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Thu Dec 30 2004 - 03:32:30 EET