--- Johannes M Ringheim <jri@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> Wolfgang Woehl wrote:
>
> >No. The point i'm trying to make is: Don't use
> reverbs. Think of real
> >rooms instead of technical devices. It will change
> your music. This is
> >about *music*, right?
> >
> There once was a site called silophone.net where you
> could upload your
> sounds and have them played through a silo. The
> system used lowres
> realaudio, so it was not fit for audiowork. It lead
> me to a mad idea,
> though. This was to have a silo or other kind of
> room with nice reverb,
> wich you could play sounds through via the net and
> download them in high
> quality. This would provide a good natural reverb.
> In fact some studios
> use similar analog/mechanic reverbs where they have
> a hole in the
> concrete wall with a speaker and mike, and mix that
> with the original
> signal to make reverb.
>
> Anyone know if such a service exist? Would this be a
> good idea?
If for no other reason, and there are some, it's
impracticle because I need the results in realtime.
For example, what reverb applied to chorus vocals
sounds best with that which I'm using on the lead
verse vocal or drum kit? The answer has to be
immediate.
ron
I'm also
> wondering if the "convolution" tecnique, wich I've
> never heard of
> before, could be useful in connection with such a
> reverb system.
>
> --
> -johannes ringheim,
> ringheims auto
> http://ringheimsauto.1go.dk
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced search.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
Received on Wed Jan 26 20:15:19 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jan 26 2005 - 20:15:20 EET