On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 14:53 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 23:40 -0800, Florin Andrei wrote:
> > On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 19:43 -0800, Florin Andrei wrote:
> >
> > Shock! Horror! I used to think that SoundBlaster are decent cards -
> > well, now, after getting used to the SB sound and migrating to 1010...
> > there's a clear difference!
>
> Not suprised, but to be completely fair the SBLive Value does have the
> cheapest codecs and worst S/N ratio of all of them. So that's not an
> entirely fair comparison. It is a $30 sound card after all.
True.
> Also did you use the rear channels as your mains? It's fairly well
> documented that the ADC used for the rear channels on sblive cards is
> much better quality.
I didn't know that. But, frankly, now i don't care. :-)
-- Florin Andrei http://florin.myip.org/Received on Sat Mar 19 08:15:09 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Mar 19 2005 - 08:15:10 EET