On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 00:22, e. j. branagan - the MUSE wrote:
> Jan Depner wrote:
>
> >On Mon, 2005-03-28 at 18:52, Aaron Trumm wrote:
> >
> >
> >>>Mostly positive, and the inevitable requests for more features ;-)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>yeah, like five bands - I bet everyone wants five bands, DON'T they? *waves
> >>a watch in front of your face*....five...bands....
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > Actually I'm planning on going to 4 parametric controls in addition
> >to the 2 shelving controls.
> >
> >Jan
> >
> >
> >
> >
> Why limit things like this? Why not optional shelving controls, and as
> many parametric bands as we want? And as many compression bands as we want?
Look at the code. This is not trivial, especially considering that
all of the parametric data must be saved and allow undo. Also, look at
the screen real estate. We've been trying to avoid bloatware. If you
look at the competing commercial offerings I don't believe any of them
have 6 parametric controls. I also don't recall any with more than
three bands of compression.
Jan
Received on Tue Mar 29 20:15:16 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Mar 29 2005 - 20:15:17 EEST