On Sat, 2005-04-23 at 18:32 -0500, Jack O'Quin wrote:
> When you double the sample rate you generally need to double the
> buffer size. So, -r96000 -p1024 would be equivalent to -r48000 -p512.
> Your latency is the same, either way.
No matter what frames/period I choose, my results are the same... lots
of XRUN callbacks skipped. I've tried 512, 1024, and 2048. It won't
let me set 4096 at all.
Alan
Received on Sun Apr 24 04:15:17 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Apr 24 2005 - 04:15:18 EEST