Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: What parts of Linux audio [need improvement]

From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@email-addr-hidden-job.com>
Date: Tue Jun 21 2005 - 02:38:28 EEST

On Tue, 2005-06-21 at 00:22 +0200, Christoph Eckert wrote:
> > 2. Audacity is my editor of choice, but it's not happy
> > with JACK.
>
> it uses portaudio, a cross platform portability layer / audio
> abstraction layer.

Your Audacity/portaudio are too old then, it most certainly does work
with JACK.

Lee
Received on Tue Jun 21 04:15:33 2005

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Steve Fosdick: "Re: [linux-audio-user] ardour question"
Previous message: Michal Seta: "Re: [linux-audio-user] ubunto + realtime performance"
Maybe in reply to: Kevin Cosgrove: "[linux-audio-user] Re: What parts of Linux audio [need improvement]"
Next in thread: Kevin Cosgrove: "Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: What parts of Linux audio [need improvement]"
Reply: Kevin Cosgrove: "Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: What parts of Linux audio [need improvement]"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jun 21 2005 - 04:15:33 EEST