En/na Dave Phillips ha escrit:
> MarC wrote:
>
>> Today I wouldn't recommend hobbyists to use Linux Audio because in
>> this way they will always be hobbyists...
>
>
> Actually, hobbyists will always be hobbyists until they acquire
> professional levels of skill *and* put themselves to the test of
> performance and/or distribution of their material. The gear they use
> will not elevate their skills one jot. Owning a guitar does not confer
> ability upon the owner.
but chosing the right guitar for your music is very important... I don't
think you *must* (it's always good) be very skillful to produce good
music, specially with modern tools. The ideas + the final sound are more
important and a good tool may help you to make them reality *more fast*.
and well, I must say I am a hobbyist musician so I admit I may be
totally wrong...
>
> I will say this about modern music technology, regardless of platform:
> It makes a lot of bad music sound much better at the surface level.
>
>> However, in my case, I've found Linux Audio very interesting to learn
>> a lot about the audio software implementation (obviously because of
>> the open source mentality) and also for understanding what kind of
>> things can be done (for a user/developper point of view). But for
>> productive work I simply can't recommend it because Pro Tools,
>> Reason,..., and a huge availability of VST plugins are too far from us.
>
>
> Strange, I use VST plugins with Linux quite a lot here at Studio Dave.
> Ardour seems to work pretty well for me too, and its price point is
> more attractive to me. ;)
Good but it could be better (in other platforms is better).
>
>
> Best is to use what works for you to make your own music.
I completely agree.
>
>
> You can also thank whatever gods you believe in that M$ didn't make
> the WAV format as proprietary as the DOC format...
>
> Best,
>
> dp
>
Received on Thu Jul 7 16:16:39 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jul 07 2005 - 16:16:40 EEST