Maybe just mention if it isn't.
It could be assumed that music posted to this public list is creative
commons.
cheers
Bob
Leonard "paniq" Ritter wrote:
>music released by me is generally released under the creative commons licence,
>as stated on the homepage.
>
>i would assume that any music posted here is released under a creative commons
>licence, but for clearity, it wouldnt hurt to explicitly mention it with the
>post.
>
>On Sunday 07 August 2005 11:02, David Collins wrote:
>
>
>>Just a suggestion: I think it would be useful if
>>people specified what license they are releasing their
>>compositions under when posting them to the list.
>>
>>I've come across some really nice tunes here, but it's
>>unfortunate that sometimes we might not know the
>>extent to which the author wants us to use/distribute
>>them etc.. And granted, some people specify the
>>licenses on their website, but others don't.
>>
>>Anyone else think this is a good idea?
>>
>>P.S. Maybe there's a specific policy already that I'm
>>not aware of?
>>
>>--
>>http://hl.afraid.org/~david/
>>--
>>
>>David Collins
>>
>>__________________________________________________
>>Do You Yahoo!?
>>Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>>http://mail.yahoo.com
>>
>>
>
>
>
Received on Sun Aug 7 16:15:07 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Aug 07 2005 - 16:15:07 EEST