R Parker wrote:
>
>
>>Anyway, I jumped all over David's proposal. The
>>topic
>>is a pet peve of mine and I'm on a personal mission.
>
>
> I got distracted and didn't make my point clear. I
> mean to say that what David is proposing is a common
> opinion on the topic and so I'm not trying to jump
> down his throat. If I ever have a mission beyound
> trying to make it to the bathroom on time it is to
> dispell the proposal that mastering is difficult.
>
> ron
>
Mastering to me comes from a long line of mystery!
It should be the last 'clean up' of a virtually good mix, not
the be all and end all of a long proccess.
Anyone can re-mix a track, its all subjective, try it yourself,
fire up XMMS and mess with the EQ, your re-mixing the tracks.
Wether their better is subject to interpretation.
mastering is only what you have been doing on the Multitrack, but using
the stereo 2 track to control any dynamics you feel need to sit better.
cheers
Bob
Rant over!
>
>>ron
>>
>>
>>>I hope this helps.
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>Dave.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>____________________________________________________
>>Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
>>http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.
> http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
>
Received on Mon Aug 15 16:15:06 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Aug 15 2005 - 16:15:06 EEST