On 8/16/05, Tracey Hytry <shakti@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> I use FC3 with the planet ccrma on top of it. I try to keep the machine as clean as I can(good way to test the Fernando's newest builds). But when I see the newest/greatest program anounced I have a hard time not wanting to check it out and build it on the machine.
Well, this approach, as installing in /opt (or whatever directory
without the package manager to know), is really error prone on the mid
term, I think. For on or two programs, this works ok. But still, you
have no ways to remove software this way, most of the time, because
you have no information on what files and modifications to the system
was done by the software you've installed (except if an uninstall
target was done in the source of the programs).
And then comes the problem of libraries. In that case, it quickly
become a big mess if you do not know exactly what you are doing. Let's
say for example you installed a library from source, and then it
become available for your package manager: you still may use the
version installed from source, wihtout you knowing it, and it may
cause some random crash because of some version differences.
Basically, installing from sources without the help of the package
manager is ok if nothing depends on what you are installing. It
quickly become unmanageable if other softwares depend on it. I found
checkinstall much more robust.
Received on Tue Aug 16 16:15:07 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Aug 16 2005 - 16:15:08 EEST