Lee Revell <rlrevell@email-addr-hidden-job.com> writes:
> On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 10:36 -0700, Noah Roberts wrote:
>> On 8/22/05, Shayne O'Connor <forums@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>>
>> > have i missed something? i've been applying patches to the 2.6.13 kernel:
>>
>> I also tried that patch but do you have amd64? When I tried to
>> compile it blew up. Lots of undefined functions and such. The kernel
>> without the patch compiles cleanly. And like I said before, I wasn't
>> going to try the *full* preemption right away anyway. So I get the
>> same stuff with the vanilla kernel as with the patch applied in the
>> end.
>>
>
> Sorry dude, that's what you get when you buy bleeding edge hardware.
> You didn't expect this new architecture to work as smoothly as i386
> which has been around for 20 years, did you?
>
> I guess you'll have to wait for the patch to support your machine.
Or, if you have no more than 3GB of RAM, run your amd64 in 32-bit
mode. That works fine and should run at least as fast.
-- joqReceived on Wed Aug 24 00:15:09 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 24 2005 - 00:15:09 EEST