studio-64 wrote:
> Lee Revell wrote:
> > He probably just got the impression that all non-firewire RME stuff
> > was well supported under Linux. That's what I thought...
>
> HI
> I too thought this of RME, their website is a bit ambiguous to say the
> least.
Well yes, they are not very clear as to the differentiation of their cards,
i.e. what card is good for what kind of use. I even got a printed ad here
where they're marketing the digi96/8 series as "the all-in-one tool for
professional harddisk recording".
> I can say the cheap(!?) Hammerfall lite I have works on all the Linux
> system I have used, with very low latencies.
Still digital I/O only, right?
> He should contact RME direct and let us know the outcome, they seem to
> be a Linux friendly company.
I'm not quite sure what I should expect from them. They won't trade in my
card since I bought it used, and I'm not too positive they will supply me
with a low latency driver for Linux ;)
> Lee Revell wrote:
> > How exactly does the hardware design not play nice with ALSA? Does it
> > need variable period sizes to do low latency? It seems like the ASIO
> > drivers must be able to do < 3-5 ms on Windows or it would not be
> > marketable...
I've found several usenet articles suggesting the Digi96/8 is capable of
latencies < 10 ms at least on Windows.
Michael
Received on Fri Sep 9 04:15:06 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Sep 09 2005 - 04:15:06 EEST