Re: [linux-audio-user] 44.1, 48 or 96?

"Joseph Dell'Orfano" <fullgo@email-addr-hidden> writes:

> I am looking for some engineering know-how and advice.

Then you should check out:

irc://irc.homelien.no/%23musicdsp (efnet) and it's mailinglist music-dsp.

Also check out the rec.audio.pro newsgroup.

Many enthusiasts and recording engineers there

> Should I track at 44.1 kHz, 48 kHz or 96 kHz?

The higher the better. Even with 192kHz you're not creating a correct
digital representation of the analog signal. Nyquist says 2 times the
highest frequency, but this still has some problems.

> recording his album at 44.1 kHz, arguing that this will avoid
> downsampling when finally pressing a CD.

Sure, but this shouldn't stop you creating the best possible fidelity
in your recordings.

> I am contemplating the addition of an outboard digital effects
> processor to take some load off my CPU.

Not advisable; rather invest in processing power where you can use
free software algorithms.

> Most units (less than $1000) with s/pdif are 44.1 and 48 kHz, so
> they would not work (I don´t think) with digital audio recorded at
> 96 kHz.

Another reason to stay away.

-- 
Esben Stien is b0ef@email-addr-hidden     s      a             
         http://www. s     t    n m
          irc://irc.  b  -  i  .   e/%23contact
          [sip|iax]:   e     e 
           jid:b0ef@    n     n