> On Mon, 2005-09-12 at 14:51 -0400, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
>> I thought it was just pam that needed changing to use the rt rlimits.
>> What needs to be done in glibc?
Lee Revell <rlrevell@email-addr-hidden-job.com> writes:
> Check the glibc development mailing list for details. The new rlimits
> are supported in their development branch IIRC.
>
>> I have patched pam packages for debian sarge on techweb.rfa.org/debrfa/
>> which seem to be working fine for me with 2.6.13.
>
> PAM is supposed to get the list of rlimits from glibc. Patching PAM
> directly is just a hack/workaround.
And don't forget all the shells. The `ulimits' command is a shell
built-in. For full support all new resources need to be added there,
as well. I wonder if they get it from glibc, too? Sigh!
-- joqReceived on Tue Sep 13 08:15:04 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Sep 13 2005 - 08:15:05 EEST