Re: [linux-audio-user] 44.1, 48 or 96?

From: Joseph Dell'Orfano <fullgo@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Thu Sep 15 2005 - 07:21:49 EEST

Thanks to all who answered this thread. I am privileged to get to learn
from everybody's experience!

-Joe D

On Mon, 2005-09-12 at 11:32 -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
> > Bouncing a final mix to 1/2 inch tape before the final print allows you
> > to do the 44.1 conversion from a high quality analog source. But, it
> > assumes that the source recordings and processing was done at an
> > extremely high level - i.e. DSD. And unfortunately, we don't yet have
> > any open-source tools for manipulating DSD. I know of a few mastering
> > houses that would *kill* to be using GNU/Linux if the tools were
> > available.
>
> there is a still quite a lot of controversy over whether or not Sony's 1
> bit/MHz clock design actually *is* better than more "traditional"
> approaches. i know there is a lot of good marketing to explain why its
> so cool, but that doesn't seem to be backed up by any substantive double
> blind testing. even the math analysis is heavy on marketing bullshit.
>

-- 
Joseph Dell'Orfano <fullgo@email-addr-hidden>
Received on Thu Sep 15 08:15:04 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Sep 15 2005 - 08:15:04 EEST