Hi!
Alle 16:18, mercoledì 28 settembre 2005, Mark Knecht ha scritto:
> I believe that you are using anticipatory. I don't know which one is
> best for low latency.
>
> You can try each one (I think) by adding a boot time option to grub.conf
>
> elevator=deadline
>
> or
>
> elevator=cfq
>
> for example.
>
> I've been interested in this also, but not enough to try and develop a
> real test. I suspect you'll have to run for a while to make a real
> determination.
I read at
http://www.jacklab.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=blogcategory&id=236&Itemid=221&lang=en_EN
that you should use the Realtime Preemption Patch and then enable it.
I'm running a 2.6.12 kernel patched with this and using also the realtime-lsm
module.
But now I'm confused, because
1) "less /sys/block/hda/queue/scheduler" gives me "noop [anticipatory]
deadline cfq", so where is the realtime preemption? Is it useful since you do
not even mention it?
2)I discovered that the rlimits way it's better: is it true? Is it also
simpler than loading the realtime module, which I can do in a straightforward
way?
Byez!
Carotinho
___________________________________
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB
http://mail.yahoo.it
Received on Fri Sep 30 16:15:10 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Sep 30 2005 - 16:15:10 EEST