On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 09:09:23 +0000
james@email-addr-hidden-dot-dat.net wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Nov, 2005 at 12:34AM -0800, Kjetil S. Matheussen spake thus:
> >
> > http://www.notam02.no/arkiv/src/
> >
>
> I normally use timemachine for recording like this - how does this
> differ?
>
> Oh, and the one thing that timemachine always annoys me with is it's
> aparrent inability to write files that can be read by anything except
> audacity. Does this do better?
Which can be remedied by reading the timemachine documentation (SCNR):
----snip
~$ timemachine -h
Usage timemachine: [-h] [-i] [-c channels] [-n jack-name]
[-t buffer-length] [-p file prefix] [-f format] [port-name ...]
-h show this help
-i interactive mode (console instead of X11) also enabled
if DISPLAY is unset
-c specify number of recording channels
-n specify the JACK name timemachine will use
-t specify the pre-recording buffer length
-p specify the saved file prefix, may include path
-f specify the saved file format
channels must be in the range 1-8, default 2
jack-name, default "TimeMachine"
file-prefix, default "tm-"
buffer-length, default 10 secs
format, default 'w64', options: wav, w64
specifying port names to connect to on the command line overrides -c
---- snap
Flo
-- Palimm Palimm! http://tapas.affenbande.orgReceived on Fri Nov 25 16:15:04 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Nov 25 2005 - 16:15:05 EET