Brian Dunn wrote:
>The possibility of using and contributing to studio
>quality audio software is really what first sparked my
>interest in linux. So I installed Mandrake 10.1,
>because someone gave it to me and it sounded cool.
>Since then i've had a lot of fun with it, using their
>mm kernel and running jack with seq24 and trying to
>come up with something cool enough to use ardour for,
>and everything ran relatively reliably. ( ....snip)
>So does anybody out there have the best of all worlds?
>good free documentation, reliable hardware support,
>binary packaging, a fast audio kernel, and config
>files that don't get re-written by some user friendly
>script somewhere that would be oh so convinient except
>for the whole doesn't work thing?
>
>If your system works the way you want it too most of
>the time, i want to hear your opinion.
>
>gratefull,
>Brian
>
>
>Hi
>
>I think the choice boils down to two things. You either need to have a distro where all the music software you want is packaged for you (like demudi or PCLinuxOS, or a distro where source packages compile well from source. I choose Slackware because of the latter: because of its 'vanilla' approach most things compile well from source, which for a non-programmer like me who cannot 'fix' things is essential, including re-compiling the kernel. I am very happy with the result.
>
>
Regards
Guy
-- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.11/191 - Release Date: 02/12/2005 ___________________________________________________________ Yahoo! Model Search 2005 - Find the next catwalk superstars - http://uk.news.yahoo.com/hot/model-search/Received on Sun Dec 4 16:15:06 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Dec 04 2005 - 16:15:07 EET