I. I. Ooisen wrote:
>> I'm not a good music reader nor writer,but when i need it Is
>>faster for me to write by hand.
>>
>>
>
>why, do you write it in adobe? :D))
>
>
>
>
Sorry my english is too much poor to understand this,I mean paper and
pencil :\
>>Last night I was playing with it and trying to
>>find the way to have a "normal" view (for me) of the score.Im
>>accustomed to the real book,and I like to write my scores in that
>>way,simple melody line and chords over,each line divided in four
>>bars,to have a clear preview of what I'm writing and reading,but
>>have not succes.This is not the first time I find this issue,and
>>probably the main cause,between others with no direct relationship
>>with noteedit,that made me reject the use and more extensive test of
>>the program.
>>
>>
>
>finale has a reputation for having (at least in its first versions) the
>most idiotic, un-intuitive, and frustrating interface in the history of
>software. believe me.
>
>
I believe you,I don't know Finale.
>don't compare noteedit with finale.
>
I didn't,I only name it in my post because here,
http://rnvs.informatik.tu-chemnitz.de/~jan/noteedit/noteedit.html
that is in the open post of this thread , is named as part of the
reason of the discontinuation of the project.
> they are conceived differently.
>noteedit is more like "nwc" ("noteworthy composer") for windows, which
>is a much friendlier design.
>
>
Don't know nwc,neither.Does it have the feature to see the sheet
as a "normal" paper,and not one line only?
>just try noteworthy composer (for windows, not gpl), and you'll see what
>i mean. then try NOTEEDIT.
>
>
Ok, goin to be difficult presently as I don't use windows
anymore,but if I got the chance,I will.
Saludos
--Carlos.
Received on Tue Dec 20 12:15:06 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Dec 20 2005 - 12:15:06 EET