I. I. Ooisen wrote:
>>I doubt it's a KDE issue, either, since Rosegarden (the *other* score
>>editor) is also a KDE application.
>
>
> rosegarden is not a score editor and will *hopefully* never be. remember
> each tool has some specific purposes. score editing is not what
> rosegarden is supposed to do.
You should tell the Rosegarden developers that because they make the
claim on the website that it is a score editor. :-) Granted, Rosegarden
is missing some stuff that NoteEdit probably has (multiple voices per
staff, easy insertion/deletion of measures), but Rosegarden has always
worked "out of the box" for me, which is why I use it, whereas NoteEdit
was problematic (see below).
> i hate combos. and perhaps all gnu/linuxists should. :)
>
> rosegarden should deal best with the way music sounds, not with the way
> music looks.
>
>
>>I use Rosegarden extensively for score editing.
>
>
> have you tried noteedit?
Yes, I have tried it. It kept crashing on me, and I had trouble getting
it to find my MIDI devices (the TSE3 library, I think, was the issue, it
was segfaulting on startup), and refused to import any of my MIDI files.
It doesn't support Jack either, which is crucial for the setup I am
using for composing and recording.
-- Brett
Received on Tue Dec 20 16:15:13 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Dec 20 2005 - 16:15:13 EET