Brent Busby wrote:
> It's occured to me that installing the kernel from Demudi stable on
> Debian might be a nice easy way to get all my kernel tweaks without even
> needing to recompile. And thanks to the way the kernel and the userland
> in Linux are so relatively version independant of one another (something
> not so true on other UNIX flavors), that should be quite safe, too.
>
> It made me wonder though -- since Demudi is built from Debian, what
> would be the issues with inporting lots of other packages useful to
> musicians as well, while still keeping the system essentially Debian?
>
> Do a lot ("a lot" meaning a destabilizing amount) of non-music-related
> packages from Debian get superceded by Demudi versions when you add the
> Demudi Apt repositories to the sources.list of a sarge machine? Are any
> of you currently doing something like that? Just wondering... I'm sure
> that even as there have been many MIDI and recording apps in sarge that
> surely would not have gotten there without Demudi, there are probably
> still others that either never made it or have newer versions in Demudi
> than what sarge gives you.
>
> I just don't want to make my system unmaintainable by mixing
> distributions like that on a really massive scale though... Once you
> get newer versions of really critical things, it can be almost like
> committing yourself to running sid/unstable -- no easy way back.
>
Demudi version 1.2.1 is based on Sarge so it should be ok bearing in
mind the following:
The only packages, I think, to avoid are demudi and cdd if you don't
want to change your Sarge setup.
Keep an eye on any messages from synaptic or apt-get whichever you use.
robin
Received on Sun Feb 5 00:15:06 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Feb 05 2006 - 00:15:06 EET