Re: [linux-audio-user] Need for JACK Rack (2)?

From: R Parker <rtp405@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Sun Feb 05 2006 - 18:35:33 EET

--- Florian Schmidt <mista.tapas@email-addr-hidden> wrote:

> On Sun, 5 Feb 2006 16:14:39 +0100
> leslie.polzer@email-addr-hidden wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 10:33:32AM -0500, Dave
> Phillips wrote:
> >
> > > I use it all the time, mainly when working with
> synths like QSynth and
> > > amSynth. I like it a lot. :)
> > >
> > > What other tools ?
> > Loki Davison and another guy mentioned "om"
> earlier in this thread, and
> > I wonder whether it makes JACK Rack obsolete.
> >
> > See http://www.nongnu.org/om-synth/ .
>
> No,
>
> while om-synth can do all that jack-rack can do, it
> takes a little more
> work for the user to do so. jack-rack's advantage is
> its simple
> straightforward approach to a common need. And
> om-synth's advantage is
> its power :) IMHO they can very happily coexist.

And there is no om-synth for FC3 + CCRMA

ron

> Flo
>
> --
> Palimm Palimm!
> http://tapas.affenbande.org
>

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Received on Sun Feb 5 20:15:06 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Feb 05 2006 - 20:15:06 EET