Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: Need for JACK Rack (2)?

From: <leslie.polzer@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Mon Feb 06 2006 - 14:37:38 EET

Hello Loki,

On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 10:11:58AM +1100, Loki Davison wrote:

> As i said originally, om is big and powerful with it's standard gui.
> The engine however is very light weight

Also in terms of dependencies?

> if it were lighter than jack rack and more stable.

Don't forget that we are talking about a complete rewrite of JACK Rack 1
(which is quite stable in its own right).

  Leslie

-- 
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 0x52D70289
http://nic-nac-project.de/~skypher/

Received on Mon Feb 6 16:15:05 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Feb 06 2006 - 16:15:05 EET