[linux-audio-user] Re: Need for JACK Rack (2)?

From: Loki Davison <loki.davison@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Mon Feb 06 2006 - 15:17:06 EET

On 2/6/06, leslie.polzer@email-addr-hidden <leslie.polzer@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>
> Hello Loki,
>
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 10:11:58AM +1100, Loki Davison wrote:
>
> > As i said originally, om is big and powerful with it's standard gui.
> > The engine however is very light weight
>
> Also in terms of dependencies?
>
> > if it were lighter than jack rack and more stable.
>
> Don't forget that we are talking about a complete rewrite of JACK Rack 1
> (which is quite stable in its own right).
>
> Leslie
>
> --
> gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 0x52D70289
> http://nic-nac-project.de/~skypher/
>
>

>From the om site.

The Om engine (which can be built by itself) requires:
Liblo 0.22 and above
Jack 0.99 and above.
And can optionally use:
Alsa sequencer
DSSI
LADSPA

It would also be great for overworked Dave to get some help ;-)

Loki
Received on Mon Feb 6 16:15:05 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Feb 06 2006 - 16:15:05 EET