On Mon, 2006-06-02 at 13:37 +0100, leslie.polzer@email-addr-hidden wrote:
> Hello Loki,
>
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 10:11:58AM +1100, Loki Davison wrote:
>
> > As i said originally, om is big and powerful with it's standard gui.
> > The engine however is very light weight
>
> Also in terms of dependencies?
Actually, it would be quite simple to make an Om frontend that's
literally identical to the Jack Rack front end in every way. Or even
take the current Jack Rack GUI and just bolt it on.
I'm not about to do it any time soon, but just saying.. :)
-DR-
Received on Tue Feb 7 04:15:06 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Feb 07 2006 - 04:15:06 EET