Re: [linux-audio-user] realtime-preempt without PAM?

From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@email-addr-hidden-job.com>
Date: Sat Feb 11 2006 - 21:31:09 EET

On Sat, 2006-02-11 at 14:04 -0500, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I've been using the Realtime LSM with 2.6 for some time now, but
> recent issues with apps getting dropped from Jack makes me think I
> should explore realtime preempt.
>
> I've built myself 2.6.15.1-rt16 and have it running. Everything I've
> read has information on configuring PAM to setup limits. My box is
> running Slackware, which doesn't use PAM.
>
> Is there some software I can use instead of PAM, for this purpose?
>
>

Please reread the list archives, you are completely misunderstanding the
relationship between realtime-preempt, realtime LSM, and PAM. Florian
and I have explained it many times.

Short version: Forget about PAM, Just use the -rt kernel together with
the realtime LSM.

Lee
Received on Sun Feb 12 00:15:08 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Feb 12 2006 - 00:15:08 EET