Re: [linux-audio-user] Athlon 64-X2 - slightly different question than the FAQ

From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@email-addr-hidden-job.com>
Date: Mon Feb 20 2006 - 11:07:53 EET

On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 00:49 -0800, Kevin Cosgrove wrote:
> One person commented that with their 64-X2
> machine, that a larger period size, 256 versus 128, seems better.
> This is generally true for avoiding xruns.
>
> I'm wondering, is an even larger period size 1K or 2K going
> to make a 64-X2 machine usable.

What exactly is the problem that you're having?

Lee
Received on Sun Feb 26 20:16:37 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Feb 26 2006 - 20:16:37 EET