On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 10:02:46PM -0600, pjfjacks wrote:
> A computer program is created as a collection of words - a unique collection
> of those words, that when compiled and executed on a target OS will
> (hopefully!) perform some function(s).
No. A computer program is not it's source code. That's an important
distinction to make!
A computer cannot run your source code. The source code is merely
there so you do not have to write out big integers to make the
computer do some work.
If I write code down on a piece of paper, a computer will *never,
ever* be able to run *that*. I must enter it in a digital form and
have it translated by some kind of compiler/interpreter/virtual
machine/whatever.
However, if I draw a picture on that piece of paper, it is already
serving as a perfectly good picture. That's why I say a computer
program is merely an integer.
> To say that a software author cannot "own" that software nor have copyrights
> to it is the same as to say an author / poet / screenwriter / columnist /
> etc. cannot have any control over his work (or get paid for doing it) once
> it is finished.
This is preciely the thesis that I debunked in my first mail. I do
see something funadementally different because a computer program (not
the source code) is merely an integer.
Like I said to Lee - I don't necessarily feel like I'm ready to throw
away all copyright as a result. There are oodles of pragmatic reasons
to keep it.
But I also find it very uncomfortable to assert ownership to an
integer.
-- Ross Vandegrift ross@email-addr-hidden "The good Christian should beware of mathematicians, and all those who make empty prophecies. The danger already exists that the mathematicians have made a covenant with the devil to darken the spirit and to confine man in the bonds of Hell." --St. Augustine, De Genesi ad Litteram, Book II, xviii, 37Received on Sun Feb 26 20:18:49 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Feb 26 2006 - 20:18:49 EET