On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 11:23:07PM -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> > But at the same time, I can't really think of a cogent
> > counterarguement that doesn't involve things like "Well, I didn't
> > *intend* that number to be a program..."
>
> Why is this a problem - intent is very VERY important in law.
Though I am compelled by legal though and legal reasoning, I'm trying
to think of things in an even stricter sense.
I agree that intent is very important in the law, so that's a plenty
good legal argument.
I just always like taking things a step further!
-- Ross Vandegrift ross@email-addr-hidden "The good Christian should beware of mathematicians, and all those who make empty prophecies. The danger already exists that the mathematicians have made a covenant with the devil to darken the spirit and to confine man in the bonds of Hell." --St. Augustine, De Genesi ad Litteram, Book II, xviii, 37Received on Sun Feb 26 20:18:50 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Feb 26 2006 - 20:18:50 EET