On Sat March 11 2006 15:18, Maluvia wrote:
> Just for clarification:
> I believe Carlo's intent was to discuss things that *could* be
> done with music - not what *should* or *must* be done.
That could be what he meant, but what he said was,
> so it appears that music that is made to be traded for shelter
> and clothing ought to contain messages that let the receiver
> be able to produce more shelter and clothing.
"Ought to" and "should" are really synonymous.
> (Be ye of the fighting Irish by any chance?) :)
Only half ;)
Rob
Received on Sun Mar 12 00:15:13 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Mar 12 2006 - 00:15:14 EET