RE: [linux-audio-user] More about consolidation of the Linux audio online resources (was: linuxdj...)

From: ico <ico@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Mon Mar 27 2006 - 21:45:32 EEST

> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-audio-user-bounces@email-addr-hidden [mailto:linux-audio-
> user-bounces@email-addr-hidden] On Behalf Of Eric Dantan Rzewnicki
> Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 12:29 PM
> To: A list for linux audio users
> Cc: daniel@email-addr-hidden
> Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] More about consolidation of the Linux
> audioonline resources (was: linuxdj...)
> ico wrote:
> > Sounds absolutely fine by me!
> >
> > I am not sure which would sound better, or
> > IMHO both have merit. Should we have both (via a
> > sym-link)?
> >
> > Please contact me off-list for the necessary login info so that I can
> begin
> > uploading stuff.
> So, Do we have a new LAD site available now?
> -ERic Rz.

Not yet,

I initially misunderstood Paul by skimming over his e-mail that he wanted to
move the content. Now that I've figured that out, it seems that the only thing
we need to get the site linked is Paul's current URL/IP where he's hosting the
content. Paul?

Also, I am not sure what would be more effective in terms of linking or IMHO both have merit (the
first does not have any redundancy in its name, but the second one is more
accurate in terms of traditional LAD name). Perhaps someone else wants to
chime in with an opinion on this one, or should we simply link both of them
for the time being so that the site becomes available while we discuss the
details? ;-)

Received on Tue Mar 28 00:15:07 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Mar 28 2006 - 00:15:08 EEST