[linux-audio-user] Re: LKML: Time to remove LSM

From: vlad <vla@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Tue Apr 18 2006 - 23:44:43 EEST

hi all,

i don't get it! in which ubuntu package (dapper or breezy) are the rtlimits-pam-modules?
they are not in the libpam-modules package.
i'm using ubuntu breezy with a self-compiled kernel (2.6.14-ck9) with
realtime-lsm.
BTW, why is the realtime-lsm method deprecated? i think it is
safe. PAM is quite delicate (that's why i don't want to build it myself).

vlad
Received on Wed Apr 19 04:15:07 2006

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Atte André Jensen: "Re: [linux-audio-user] alsa client numbering"
Previous message: Lee Revell: "Re: [linux-audio-user] LKML: Time to remove LSM (was Re: [RESEND][RFC][PATCH 2/7] implementation of LSM hooks)"
Next in thread: Dana Olson: "Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: LKML: Time to remove LSM"
Reply: Dana Olson: "Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: LKML: Time to remove LSM"
Maybe reply: Lee Revell: "Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: LKML: Time to remove LSM"
Maybe reply: Dana Olson: "Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: LKML: Time to remove LSM"
Maybe reply: tim hall: "Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: LKML: Time to remove LSM"
Maybe reply: paul wisehart: "Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: LKML: Time to remove LSM"
Maybe reply: tim hall: "Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: LKML: Time to remove LSM"
Maybe reply: Lee Revell: "Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: LKML: Time to remove LSM"
Maybe reply: Dana Olson: "Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: LKML: Time to remove LSM"
Maybe reply: Eric Dantan Rzewnicki: "Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: LKML: Time to remove LSM"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Apr 19 2006 - 04:15:07 EEST