Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: LKML: Time to remove LSM

From: Dana Olson <dana@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Wed Apr 19 2006 - 01:33:36 EEST

On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 22:44 +0200, vlad wrote:
> hi all,
>
> i don't get it! in which ubuntu package (dapper or breezy) are the rtlimits-pam-modules?
> they are not in the libpam-modules package.

dana@email-addr-hidden:~$ dpkg -L libpam-modules | grep limits
/etc/security/limits.conf
/lib/security/pam_limits.so

> i'm using ubuntu breezy with a self-compiled kernel (2.6.14-ck9) with
> realtime-lsm.
> BTW, why is the realtime-lsm method deprecated? i think it is
> safe. PAM is quite delicate (that's why i don't want to build it myself).

It doesn't matter what you want or what you think, it's deprecated. You
can continue using it until your distro drops it if you want. It makes
no difference.

Since you are on Ubuntu, when you upgrade to Dapper, you do NOT need
realtime-lsm anymore.

In the meantime, on debian and Ubuntu Breezy, PAM is not "delicate" - in
fact is it very simple to patch PAM for rlimits support.

Dana
Received on Wed Apr 19 04:15:08 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Apr 19 2006 - 04:15:09 EEST